Developing Style in Your Legal Writing
In this interactive seminar, we unlock the mystery of style by focusing on ideas like concision, rhythm, and emphasis to help you develop writing that sounds good in your own voice.
In this interactive seminar, we unlock the mystery of style by focusing on ideas like concision, rhythm, and emphasis to help you develop writing that sounds good in your own voice.
Tethered to these rules, it’s easy to spend too much time thinking about what you can’t do (the rules), rather than what you should do (style).
Developing a unique voice in legal writing becomes difficult when your “style” is a succession of monotonous, lifeless sentences. And flawlessly employing the rules of grammar is no guarantee of good writing, because let’s face it: no one has ever marveled at your use of commas (semicolons, maybe).
Good style is often the forgotten element in legal writing because it’s almost impossible to define. It grabs your readers’ attention and makes them want to keep reading. While we recognize good style when we see it, this means nothing if we can’t use these tools in our own writing. Style is important whether your reader is a client, a colleague or the court. You can’t be convincing if your writing is dull and uninspired, and good grammar alone may not be enough to ensure that your transactional documents are clear and concise.
In this interactive seminar, we unlock the mystery of style by focusing on ideas like concision, rhythm, and emphasis to help you develop writing that sounds good in your own voice. We’ll examine sample texts, then apply what we’ve learned to crafting good sentences that are clear and readable.
Varying your sentence length and sentence structure is the easiest way to add style to your legal writing.
Amazing. I think I could have skipped all of college English and just attended that three hour program.
This seminar features 10 tips to make your legal writing, regardless of context or audience, clear and concise. Ben uses both good and not-so-good examples from inside and outside the legal world in this interactive seminar.
An AI writing tool is like a good friend: you might ask them to review your work, but you’d never submit it before reviewing their changes.
Clients and colleagues want your work product now. That means you want to start the writing process quickly, write efficiently once you get started, then deliver a clear and accurate final product. In this interactive program, you’ll learn actionable strategies for making every stage of the writing process, from outlining to proofreading, quick and accurate.
Have you ever listened to a long-winded colleague drone on, saying something in 100 words that could have been said in 10? It’s likely that you became annoyed, distracted, and uninterested. It’s a waste of time for everyone. Writing is no different.
There are two kinds of writing: captive and non-captive. Captive writing is for the court, who is required to read it. Non-captive writing is different: reading is optional. No one has to read it.
This seminar teaches partners how to give relevant feedback to attorneys to help them become better writers. While red lining an associate’s work product may be a time-saver in the short run, it’s a time-waster in the long run if the attorney repeats the mistakes.
The statement of facts is one of the most important parts of your brief, creating a dominant first impression that wins over your reader immediately. But it also advances your argument: it’s subtly persuasive, and a good one pulls the reader to your position.
When we explain a concept from our area of expertise, it’s easy to forget that our readers don’t share our knowledge. The result? A confused and frustrated reader who sees nothing but jargon and convoluted phrases. Good writers explain a topic in a manner that anyone can understand.
Bad punctuation diminishes your credibility and prevents the smooth flow of ideas. Even worse, your message can be misinterpreted or unintelligible.