Delivering Effective Feedback to Associates
This seminar teaches partners how to give relevant feedback to attorneys to help them become better writers.
This seminar teaches partners how to give relevant feedback to attorneys to help them become better writers.
A meeting that delivers constructive criticism once is a much better use of time than repeated sessions of red-lining, and in this seminar Ben shows partners how to coach attorneys and deliver effective feedback. Ben draws upon his experience as a legal writing coach for ten years and as director of two university writing centers in this popular program.
Be more specific in your comments when evaluating writing. Vague comments such as “be punchier” or “be more concise” are not helpful because each has multiple meanings.
Ben is knowledgeable and on point. The engagement with the audience was fascinating. He drew out some provoking thoughts, enforced good rules, and made me think about changing how I write and how I interact with associates on their writing.
This seminar features 10 tips to make your legal writing, regardless of context or audience, clear and concise. Ben uses both good and not-so-good examples from inside and outside the legal world in this interactive seminar.
An AI writing tool is like a good friend: you might ask them to review your work, but you’d never submit it before reviewing their changes.
Clients and colleagues want your work product now. That means you want to start the writing process quickly, write efficiently once you get started, then deliver a clear and accurate final product. In this interactive program, you’ll learn actionable strategies for making every stage of the writing process, from outlining to proofreading, quick and accurate.
Have you ever listened to a long-winded colleague drone on, saying something in 100 words that could have been said in 10? It’s likely that you became annoyed, distracted, and uninterested. It’s a waste of time for everyone. Writing is no different.
There are two kinds of writing: captive and non-captive. Captive writing is for the court, who is required to read it. Non-captive writing is different: reading is optional. No one has to read it.
This seminar teaches partners how to give relevant feedback to attorneys to help them become better writers. While red lining an associate’s work product may be a time-saver in the short run, it’s a time-waster in the long run if the attorney repeats the mistakes.
The statement of facts is one of the most important parts of your brief, creating a dominant first impression that wins over your reader immediately. But it also advances your argument: it’s subtly persuasive, and a good one pulls the reader to your position.
When we explain a concept from our area of expertise, it’s easy to forget that our readers don’t share our knowledge. The result? A confused and frustrated reader who sees nothing but jargon and convoluted phrases. Good writers explain a topic in a manner that anyone can understand.
Bad punctuation diminishes your credibility and prevents the smooth flow of ideas. Even worse, your message can be misinterpreted or unintelligible.